Jharkhand in turmoil: What does the law say on holding an office of profit?

Under Articles 102(1) and 191(1) of the Indian Constitution, an MP or MLA is barred from holding any office of profit under the central or state government

Hemant Soren
BS Web Team New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Aug 26 2022 | 10:42 AM IST
Jharkhand is in a state of turmoil after reports suggested that Chief Minister Hemant Soren may be sacked by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the office-for-profit case. The ECI has reportedly sent its recommendations to Governor Ramesh Bais on the allegations against Soren. 

Soren allegedly allocated a mining lease to himself while holding the portfolio of the minister of mining in 2021. 

What is an 'office of profit'?

An office of profit is a position that brings any financial gain, advantage, or benefit to the officeholder. In the Jharkhand case, the mining lease had the capacity to bring financial gain to Soren. 

Under Articles 102(1) and 191(1) of the Indian Constitution, an MP or MLA is barred from holding any office of profit under the central or state government. 

"A person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the government of India or the government of any state by reason only that he is a minister," Article 102(1) states. 

It is also barred in the Representation of People Act, 1951. 

The essence of the restriction is that if legislators hold an office of profit, they may get biased and not discharge their constitutional duties fairly. There should not be any conflict between the duties and the interests of an elected representative. 

The Constitution's basic principle of separation of powers between the legislature and the executive is applied here. 

The origin of the law can be seen in the English Act of Settlement, 1701, according to a report by The Hindu. It read, "no person who has an office or place of profit under the King, or receives a pension from the Crown, shall be capable of serving as a member of the House of Commons."

Several instances of violation of the rule have been noted in the past as well. In 2018, 20 MLAs of the Delhi Assembly were disqualified by EC for holding an office-of-profit.

The governor has not made the recommendations by the ECI public yet, but is expected to do it soon.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Quarterly Starter

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

Save 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online

  • Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Election Commission of IndiaHemant SorenJharkhandOffice of profitJharkhand Mukti Morcha

Next Story