Explore Business Standard
Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.
After the Supreme Court quashed the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-led West Bengal government's acquisition of 997 acres of agricultural land for Tata Motors' small car plant in Singur, the state government is faced with the prospect of scaling down one of its own pet projects - a "mishti hub" (sweets hub) in Bardhaman - in the face of a Singur-like protest. The state government has decided to drop a 10.5-acre site in Alisha village after people who lost land demanded it back citing the Singur verdict and has instead identified two plots, 0.5 acres each and 2.5 km apart. However, traders' associations are not very happy at the prospect of having "a handful of sweet shops" instead of a proper production and export centre.
The Supreme Court (SC) judgment asking for Singur land to be returned to the original owners could likely open several cases of land acquisition carried out before 2009. But, the judgment will have no impact on land being acquired for Smart City projects, claim experts."The judgment again tosses in the air the concept of public interest", said Suhaan Mukherjee, partner at PLR Chambers, which specialises in public policy. The two judges have differed on whether the land acquired for the Tata Nano project in Singur was in public interest.On Wednesday, a two-judge bench ruled as invalid the acquisition of land in Singur by the West Bengal government for a Tata Motors' project made in 2006. The judges have asked the state to return the 997 acres of land to the farmers, since the acquisition made under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was "perverse and illegal" by the then state government. The Singur land acquisition has been a watershed for land disputes in India. All political parties