 "Delaware Supreme Court rules Byju's defaulted on $1.5 bn loan to US lenders")
The Supreme Court of the US state of Delaware has ruled that Indian edtech company Byju’s defaulted on a $1.5 billion loan, entitling lenders to "exercise remedies".
The ruling on September 23 allows lenders to take control of Byju’s assets in the United States, primarily Byju Alpha Inc., and demand full repayment. Lenders have appointed Timothy Pohl as the sole director of Byju Alpha Inc for the purpose.
“We are gratified that the Delaware Supreme Court decisively affirmed what we have known all along: Byju’s breached and defaulted on the credit agreement it knowingly and willingly entered into," they said in a statement.
"Most notably, this ruling confirms that Byju’s was in default, which both Byju (Raveendran) and Riju personally acknowledged when they signed multiple amendments to the credit agreement on Byju’s behalf between October 2022 and January 2023,” the statement said, referring to the edtech company's founder and his younger brother.
“As such, and as validated by the Delaware Supreme Court, the lenders were well within their contractual rights to accelerate the term loan and take control of Byju Alpha Inc.”
Also Read
The case in the Delaware court centred around a $1.5 billion Term Loan B guaranteed by Think & Learn, the parent company of Byju’s.
In a separate statement, the lenders said: “Byju has attempted to concoct an alternate narrative that Byju’s did not default and to place the blame for the company’s failure on others, rather than repaying the lenders the money that is rightfully owed to us, including disclosing what happened to the $533 million of missing loan proceeds.”
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled that the series of amendments to the credit agreement, entered into between October 2022 and January 2023, make it clear that Byju’s voluntarily conceded both that events of default occurred and the consequences thereof, namely GLAS’s legal entitlement to exercise remedies. (GLAST is the trustee for lenders to which Byju's owes $1.2 billion)
The ruling added: “Nor is this a situation where a sophisticated party tricked an unsophisticated party with fine print and legal jargon. The amendments were contracts extensively negotiated by sophisticated, well-counselled parties, and the several rounds of amendments demonstrate an obvious, deliberate effort by the parties to address this specific issue. Accordingly, the parties are bound by the terms of the credit agreement.”