In the secondary market, investors have to submit collateral (in the form of shares) or transfer funds in advance to the broker before executing a trade. This results in brokerages holding substantial sums in such floats — the average daily float is about Rs 30,000 crore. While the broker may pay interest, this practice also places the investor’s funds at risk in case the broker defaults. It also leaves funds and collateral open to misuse by the broker. The regulator believes that it can use the new multiple debits facility for the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) to create a new ASBA mechanism. This will allow investors to block funds in their bank account for trading in the secondary market, instead of transferring upfront to the broker. As and when the trade occurs, the funds would be transferred directly to the clearing corporation.
Sebi suggests brokerage and securities transaction tax may be deducted by the clearing corporation and passed on to brokers, or paid directly by investors to them. Obviously, this could be beneficial to investors since it would improve the safety of funds. It would also reduce the chances of brokers making dangerous over-leveraged bets, which lead to defaults. However, there are several things to consider when designing the mechanism. One is ensuring a level playing field. Brokerages that are subsidiaries of banks can offer what is known as 3-in-1 accounts where the brokerage can access the funds and demat account when the need arises. Standalone brokerages currently compete by charging lower fees, offering more advisory support and more flexible margins. This move to ASBA may skew the field in favour of bank-backed brokerages, especially if the mechanism is slow.
The technicalities are much more complex for secondary market trades. An IPO is a static process with only one security involved, only one agency handling allotment, and so on. Reconciling IPO accounts is not difficult. Secondary-market operations involve far more stakeholders and far more instruments, including equities, derivatives, and forex and commodity futures, each with different prices and different margins. A trade may be placed simultaneously on both exchanges, and may be configured in multiple ways and the price of the asset will change within seconds. There are massive volumes of such highly dynamic trades. The secondary ASBA mechanism would have to be well designed and stress-tested to prevent slowdowns, and glitches in practice. If it can be made to work, however, this would definitely reduce concern about misuse of investor funds.
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Quarterly Starter
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app