5-judge Constitution Bench starts hearing Delhi vs Centre power dispute

State list is like concurrent list for Delhi, observes CJI Chandrachud

Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India. Photo: ANI
BS Reporter New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 11 2023 | 12:13 AM IST
The five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, began hearing the dispute between the Delhi government and the Centre regarding the control of administrative services in the state on Tuesday.
 
Senior advocate AM Singhvi, appearing for the Delhi government, outlined some broad issues in the matter. “This is at its core not about the balance between Centre and Delhi. It’s about whether civil servants serving in the NCT are accountable through the government and through them the people who elected the Delhi government,” he said.
 
He said the exclusion of civil servants from the government negated the government. “Can you imagine a UT with a legislature, a government, but no civil services? Then we may as well not have created [Article] 239AA [of the Constitution].”
 
Article 239A of the Constitution talks about the creation of local legislatures or council of ministers or both for certain Union territories and 239AA talks about special provisions concerning Delhi.
 
The CJI, meanwhile, observed that in the case of the NCT, Parliament can enact on the state list and concurrent list but the Delhi assembly can enact on any aspect of the state. In that sense, the state list and concurrent list are both concurrent, he said.
 
“If Parliament is operating in the concurrent list, what is the power in NCT?” the CJI asked.
 
The application filed by the Centre said it was seeking reference of appeal to a larger Bench of the court for a holistic interpretation of Article 239AA of the Constitution, which was central to determining the issues involved.
 
It said that the interpretation of Article 239AA based upon the principle of representative governance missed a very fundamental fact. The question was not one of representative governance. It was the choice between the one representative government, the Union government, or another representative government, the government of UT, it said.
 
The other members of the five-judge Bench are justices M R Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli, and P S Narasimha.
 
The hearing will continue tomorrow.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Quarterly Starter

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

Save 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online

  • Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :D Y ChandrachudDelhicentral governmentpower

Next Story