HC quashes order on taxing Flipkart payment to Walmart for deputed staff

Court says assessing officer's stand on employer-employee relationship based on a wrong premise

Flipkart
Flipkart (Photo: Bloomberg)
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jun 28 2022 | 1:13 AM IST
In a second major ruling on seconded employees in recent times, the Karnataka High Court has set aside an order of the Income-Tax Department that called upon Flipkart Internet to withhold tax on the payments it made to Walmart as remuneration to the staff it hired from the US major.

Seconded employees refer to those sent on deputation for a stipulated period for the mutual benefit of the companies concerned.

The case relates to an inter-company master services agreement signed by Flipkart and Walmart for secondment of employees. These employees were working in India in the period relevant to assessment year 2020-21. Flipkart paid Walmart to reimburse these employees. Walmart in turn paid the employees their salaries for administrative convenience.

Flipkart sought a certificate of no deduction of tax at source from the Income-Tax Department. However, the department rejected the request, asking Flipkart to deduct tax at source. The assessing officer argued that Flipkart did not have an employer-employee relationship with the staff and that the sum paid was a fee for technical services (FTS).

However, the court ruled that the assessing officer's stand on employer-employee relationship was based on a wrong premise and was liable to be set aside.

The court ruled that the secondment agreement is an independent contract between employees and Flipkart--a point the assessing officer missed. The court directed the income tax department to grant Flipkart a certificate of nil tax deduction at source.

Sandeep Sehgal, partner tax at AKM, said the order reveals the arbitrary approach of the tax department in granting such certificates. "It is a settled position that withholding of tax would get triggered in this case only if the payment to be made to Walmart by Flipkart would have an income element. Since the payment was for cost-to-cost reimbursement of salaries of seconded employees, which was also not taxable as technical services," he said.

This ruling is the second major order on seconded employees in recent times. Last month, the Supreme Court had ruled that the salary of seconded employees deposited to an Indian company that is reimbursed to the overseas entities will be subject to service tax.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Quarterly Starter

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

Save 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online

  • Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :TDSFlipkartWalmartKarnatakae-commerce marketemployeesKarnataka governmentHigh CourttaxPaymentemployersIncome Tax department

Next Story