1. The notional licence fee based on 53,550 tonnes for the Related Products; and
2. The valuation of Company's shareholding in Dystar based on the notional license fee, after adjusting for the fact that discount for lack of marketability is not a relevant adjustment as found by the Court of Appeal.
Powered by Capital Market - Live News
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve hit your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month, subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Months/month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Months/month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Unlimited access to all articles
30+ premium stories daily, handpicked by our editor


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio
Wirecutter & The Athletic
Complimentary Access to Our e-Paper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper
Read, save, share any article


Curated Newsletters on Diverse Topics
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Smart Investment Tips
In-depth stock analysis & insights
The Smart Investor for wealth growth tips


Access to Extensive Historical Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading Experience
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997