'Not fit & proper': SAT scraps Sebi order against 5 brokers in NSEL case

Market regulator asked to conduct a fresh investigation into the matter and pass an order within six months.

sebi
File photo: PTI
Samie Modak Mumbai
2 min read Last Updated : Jun 15 2022 | 12:37 AM IST
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has set aside a 2019 order passed by markets regulator - the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) - declaring five brokerages not ‘fit and proper’ for their alleged involvement in the National Spot Exchange (NSEL) fiasco.

“The impugned orders passed by the whole-time member (WTM) against the brokers cannot be sustained and are quashed. The appeals of the brokers are allowed,” said SAT in a 44-page order dated June 9.

The five brokers are IIFL Commodities, Geofin Comtrade, Anand Rathi Commodities, Phillip Commodities India, and Motilal Oswal Commodities Broker.

SAT decision, however, is more of an interim relief as the tribunal has directed Sebi to conduct a fresh investigation into the matter and pass an order within six months.

In 2019, NSEL was unable to settle the so-called paired contracts, committing defaults and causing huge losses to the trading clients. 

Sebi had passed orders against the five brokers based on various inputs received from agencies, including the Economic Offences Wing.

Paired contracts involved buying and selling the same commodity through two different contracts at two different prices on the exchange platform. 
NSEL allowed investors to buy a short duration settlement contract and sell a long duration settlement contract and vice versa at the same time.

The reason SAT set aside the orders against the brokers was mainly because Sebi primarily relied upon inputs received from various regulatory agencies, along with investor complaints to arrive at the conclusion that the five brokerages were close to NSEL.

“The WTM is required to consider these aspects and not close the issue on the presumption that the appellant, while acting as a facilitator to carry out the trades on behalf of his clients, is closely connected to NSEL,” read the SAT order.

“All brokers facilitate trades on behalf of their clients on the exchange platform. It does not mean that all brokers are closely connected to the exchange. Such findings given by the WTM appear to be farfetched and arbitrary,” it said.

SAT has said Sebi, if necessary, can conduct an independent enquiry proceeding against the connected entities and persons associated with the brokers against whom evidence is available.

SAT has also asked Sebi to give a chance to the brokers to examine the evidence weighed in by the regulator and also give them a hearing before passing the orders.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Quarterly Starter

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

Save 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online

  • Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :SEBISecurities Appellate TribunalAnand Rathi

Next Story