As for Walgreens and Safeway, the lawyer said, the partners’ losses may be the result of broken contracts, but Balwani can’t be held liable for the sums as part of his conviction, Walsh said. “These amounts might be the result of unrealized promises but they’re not the result of fraud,” she told the judge.
Bob Leach, a lead prosecutor, described Balwani’s argument as “extraordinary.”
“It’s a remarkable position to say that restitution here is zero,” he told Davila.
Theranos shareholders invested based on Balwani’s and Holmes’s lies, Leach said, making their losses “completely foreseeable.” It’s too much of a stretch for Balwani to join a conspiracy with Holmes and now argue “that the victim is somehow out of luck because he left the company,” he said.