You want to bring down the in-patient contribution to revenue from 75 per cent to 50 per cent. Can you elaborate?
One of the major vulnerabilities for healthcare organisations such as ours is that we are only relevant for a person at the absolute end of the healthcare journey. Everything that happens before that, from the time they start to feel a little uneasy, from the time they take the medicine, get a diagnosis, have to talk to some doctors, we are not participating in any of that and more often what happens in this country is that people may not get the best advice. They may be recommended surgery too late, they may be recommended surgery too early, and they may be put on the wrong sort of drugs. So, for us, we believe it’s very important that if we want to be a total healthcare provider, we have to be there for the patient from time they start to feel a little uneasy, but it’s hard because not everyone wants to go to a hospital for every little thing. So, part of this is another amount of investment, not on the same scale of adding hospitals, but another investment in building clinics much closer to where people live - close to their apartment, close to their office, close to the main road, which are smaller, which allows them to consult, which also gives them the option for them to talk to doctors on the app or the medicines online or for someone to come home and take the test. So, those are things that will be valuable for our patients in the cities where we are present and that's part of the thing we are doing. So, at least half of our revenue should come from people not in the hospital.