Delhi HC rejects plea to stop SpiceJet flights after seven mishaps

The issue of non-payment of salary was also highlighted in the plea

SpiceJet
Last year, the DGCA in its audit, revealed that SpiceJet was facing a fund crunch and that its maintenance procedures were concerning
Bhavini Mishra New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jul 18 2022 | 11:44 PM IST
In a relief to SpiceJet, the Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed a plea seeking to cancel its flights in the wake of seven mishaps in the last two months, highlighting that the Aviation Act in itself is good enough to examine this issue.

“The Aviation Act is a robust mechanism in respect to the aviation industry to address the issue. The airlines cannot be told not to operate based on this public interest litigation (PIL),” a bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad, said.

The petition was filed by advocate Rahul Bhardwaj, seeking directions to the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and others to form a fast-track body to consider stopping the SpiceJet flights until all security measures were followed. Referring to three mishaps in May, two in June, and two in July, the PIL said the lives of people were at risk due to poor management of the airline.

The issue of non-payment of salary was also highlighted in the plea.

After considering the aforementioned points, the HC said the aviation act makes the rules on safety, flying, registration, and marking of aircraft, underscoring that the DGCA is the competent authority to look into such issues.

“The DGCA is free to take action. In fact, it is quite prompt in taking action. Some show cause notices have already been issued against some flights,” it added.

Last year, the DGCA in its audit, revealed that SpiceJet was facing a fund crunch and that its maintenance procedures were concerning.

On July 6 this year, the aviation regulator issued a show cause notice to the airline, following eight incidents of technical malfunction in its aircraft since June 19. It said the budget carrier had "failed" to establish safe, efficient, and reliable air services.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Quarterly Starter

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

Save 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online

  • Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :SpiceJetDelhi High CourtIndian airlinesAviation sectoraviation SpiceJetSpiceJet caseSpiceJet Jet Airwaysflightsairline industryAirlineDGCA

Next Story