Cyrus Investments Private Limited and Sterling Investment Corporation Private Limited - companies of Tata Son's ex-chairman Cyrus Mistry - began their appeal on Thursday against orders passed by the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissing the companys' pleas of oppression and mismanagement in Tata Sons Limited.Lawyer for the Mistry companies, senior advocate C A Sudaram began his arguments before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) by saying that the NCLT had erred on interpreting the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 on oppression and mismanagement while dismissing their pleas on the grounds of maintainability. On March 6, the NCLT had come to conclusion that the Mistry petitions were not maintainable as they had failed to satisfy the requirement under Section 244 of the Companies Act since it had not initiated by one-tenth of the total amount of members (or issued share capital), when preference shareholders were taken into account. ...
NCLT has termed the petition filed as "proxy litigation" alleging mismanagement by the Tata group
In English law, shareholders can try on two remedies: derivative action and unfair prejudice claim
The bench of B S V Prakash Kumar and V Nallasenapathy is likely to pass the order on Apr 17
NCLT to hear the plea of Mistry's companies on Tuesday, on eligibility criteria
What seemed a sweetheart deal given to Sivasankaran might have triggered Mistry sacking
This, in the wake of concerns raised by ousted chairman Cyrus Mistry
The National Company Law Tribunal today began hearing on maintainability of petitions filed by two firms controlled by Cyrus Mistry's family against his ouster from Tata Sons, the holding company of Tata Group. Tata Sons opposed the petitions filed by Cyrus Mistry Investment and Sterling Investment Corporation, saying as per a Supreme Court order on Companies Act, the petitioners could not seek a relief against alleged violation of their rights as 'minority shareholders'. Mistry's counsel said the issue called for "fresh interpretation of provisions of the new Companies Act", and therefore the petitions were maintainable. Last December, the two Mistry firms challenged before NCLT Cyrus Mistry's unceremonious removal by Tata Sons as its chairman and also as a director of its board on October 24. The NCLT bench of BSV Prakash Kumar and V Nallasenapathy allowed both the parties to argue on the maintainability and waiver applications. The waiver plea by two Mistry firms seeks a ...
Consolidated gross sales increased to Rs 29,279 crore, from Rs 25,662.3 crore in the year-ago period
Bombay House EGM last in a series to oust Mistry from group
Lawyer argued Mistry had been oppressed and there was no genuine reason for him to be ousted
Tata Sons' Board had ousted Mistry earlier on October 24, 2016
A year ago, Tata Sons could have bought this stake for Rs 8,000 crore
No serious breach of the existing provisions has been found so far: Sebi
Provisioning coverage would increase substantially, Mistry said in his annexures to the NCLT petition
Mistry was responding to charges made by the Tatas that group was underperforming during his tenure
The spat has put spotlight on vulnerability of independent company directors in India
Regulator says boards are best decision makers on corporate governance
The unit's cost is Rs 5,600 crore and Swan Energy is open to diluting its 74% stake in the project
Schraven, Robb, Srinivasan & Munjee have conflict of interests, says Wadia