A bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul said it had already listed the appeals before the appropriate bench in January
Naqvi also rejected the opposition's claim that the BJP and its Hindutva affiliates were deliberately bringing forth the Ram temple issue ahead of the Lok Sabha elections
More than 25 years after the Babri Masjid was destroyed, another generation proclaims its commitment to building a Ram temple
Vijay Singh, a doctor who lives near the Ram Janmabhoomi, is a devout Hindu but he says he is not in favour of building a temple there if it leads ti acrimony between two communities
It is, however, still unclear if the government might bring in a Bill in the winter session of Parliament for early construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya
On October 29, the apex court had adjourned the hearing of the Ram Janabhoomi case until January 2019
I'm aware of instances that happened in the past where decisions of the Supreme Court were scuttled by the legislative process, says the retired SC judge
RSS General Secretary said the organisation will not hesitate to launch an agitation for Ram temple
The Supreme Court cannot take decisions on the basis of 'Hindu bhavna', says Owaisi
The RSS leader said the issue was no more limited to Hindus and Muslims or a temple or a mosque, but about the restoration of the pride of the country
The Supreme Court has turned down requests for early hearings in the Ayodhya title dispute and said it will decide the schedule in the first week of January
Hardline stance comes after Supreme Court postones daily hearings till Jan, leaving little room for manouver by Centre
A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, said an "appropriate bench" will decide in January next year the future course of hearing on the appeals filed against the Allahabad HC
CJI Ranjan Gogoi said an 'appropriate bench' will decide in January 2019 the future course of hearing on the appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court verdict in the Ayodhya land dispute case
Earlier, a three-judge bench refused to refer to a five-judge constitution bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations in its 1994 judgement that a mosque was not integral to Islam
The court had on September 27 said the civil suit on land dispute would be heard by a three-judge bench on October 29
The matter would be heard by a bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K.M. Joseph
SC said now the civil suit on land dispute will be heard by a newly constituted three-judge Bench from October 29 as Justice Misra will retire on October 2 as the CJI
Hindu groups have said the medieval-era mosque at the disputed site was built over the ruins of a temple that marked the birthplace of their god, Lord Ram
We have to find the context in which 5 judges delivered 1994 verdict in Ismail Farooqi case that mosque is not integral to Islam, the court said